Google Targets Low Quality Sites with Exciting Algorithm Change

Google Targets Low Quality Sites with Exciting Algorithm Change

Recently we posted about “Google getting tough on SPAM” with algorithm changes aimed at improved detection and penalising of websites with scraped or copied content – or simply little or no original quality content. In the last couple of days Google has officially announced on their blog the roll out of an algorithm change that, in their words, “noticeably impacts 11.8% of [our] queries”.

From the official Google post;

This update is designed to reduce rankings for low-quality sites—sites which are low-value add for users, copy content from other websites or sites that are just not very useful. At the same time, it will provide better rankings for high-quality sites—sites with original content and information such as research, in-depth reports, thoughtful analysis and so on.

We can’t make a major improvement without affecting rankings for many sites. It has to be that some sites will go up and some will go down. Google depends on the high-quality content created by wonderful websites around the world, and we do have a responsibility to encourage a healthy web ecosystem. Therefore, it is important for high-quality sites to be rewarded, and that’s exactly what this change does.

Whilst the algorithm change is at this stage being rolled out only in the US, Google’s plans to extend this to search results in other countries excites the heck out of us! E-Web are, and will continue to be, advocates of quality, original, and regular content addition to any website wishing to increase exposure and rankings. The addition of content adds value to your visitors and expands the scope of reasons one has to visit your site – which means more visitors, lower bounce rates, higher primary rankings, and rankings for a bunch of relevant long tail terms you may not have even realised your potential customers were seeking.

The debate between content, links, or the quality, ratio and correlation of the two can and will roll on forever. So to simplify we will focus on content adding value to your customers and potential customers. That can never be a bad thing.

What to expect when this change hits Australian search results? Personally I hope to see a shake-up of many heavily competed search term results pages. However as someone who still sees websites with invisible content and other stone-age black hat techniques continuing to reap the benefits of prominent rankings, I remain somewhat skeptical of just how much impact these algorithmic changes will have in an “automated across-the-board” fashion.

Google made over 450 algorithm changes in 2007, and surely many more in the last couple of years, yet search quality remains an issue. Matt Cutts recently posted a comparison of matching search results in 2000 and 2011 – things have definitely improved. Maintaining and improving search results quality will continue to be a perpetual cat and mouse game. At times it may be a case of bending the rules or losing out to more audacious competitors – however announcements like this offer positive signs for those who follow the rules diligently in the hopes of justice!

Where do you sit on this? Do you invest the time or resources needed to grow your website? Do you feel some of your competitors will or should suffer under this change?

E-Web Marketing
Follow us

E-Web Marketing

We’ve been in the digital marketing field for over 18 years and worked with hundreds of Australian (and international) businesses to grow their web presence. Specialising in SEO, search ads (PPC), social media, content marketing, email marketing and conversion rate optimisation.
E-Web Marketing
Follow us

Latest posts by E-Web Marketing (see all)

E-Web Marketing

<p>We’ve been in the digital marketing field for over 18 years and worked with hundreds of Australian (and international) businesses to grow their web presence. Specialising in SEO, search ads (PPC), social media, content marketing, email marketing and conversion rate optimisation.</p>

2 Comments
  • The Original Dave
    Reply
    Posted at 11:12 am, March 4, 2011

    It’s about bloody time Google did this: there is so much useless content out there, that you can almost know by looking at the results page that the search terms you used were a waste of time.

    I feel Google is about 2 years too late with this, and for once the monolith is behind the users/abusers, where normally they are ahead. Perhaps a sign of over extension by the Big G?

  • Simon
    Reply
    Posted at 3:18 pm, March 4, 2011

    Could not agree with you more Dave. In the full original article it mentioned the fact that that algorithm change was able to remove 86% of the top several dozen hand identified spam sites.

    That is an extremely impressive figure! Only a highly advanced content assessment algorithm capable of deciphering many variables could generate such high numbers.

    Numbers it would take any other search engine 10 years to produce.

    Everything Google does it does with outstanding precision.

Post a Comment

Comment
Name
Email
Website